🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.